Cases 31 - 40 of 1,625
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05650
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Burch v. Thompson
as 3:2023cv50411
Plaintiff:
Eddie Burch
Defendant:
Rockford Police Department, Andrew Kennington, Rockford Housing Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DANIELS v. ARROYO et al
as 4:2023cv00476
Plaintiff:
DARRYL C DANIELS
Defendant:
CHRISTINE L ARROYO, MS HEMLINGER, MRS MCCALPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04859
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Randle v. Contra Costa Cnty. Super. Ct.
as 3:2023cv05799
Plaintiff:
Jason Thomas and Ramello D. Randle
Defendant:
Contra Costa County Superior Court of Martinez, Judge Horimoto, Judge Tharesa Canepa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanback v. Evans et al
as 1:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
James Stanback
Defendant:
Officer Evans and Paul Burch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv09017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Burch v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2023cv00878
Plaintiff:
Debra Burch
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Burch v. State of North Carolina
as 3:2023cv00780
Petitioner:
Carlos Demarcuis Burch
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BURCH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv32850
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY BURCH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
