Cases 1 - 10 of 40
USA v. Winans
as 24-30253
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Dwayne Winans, Jr., also known as Butter Winans
Griffin v. Cocoa Butter Lotion et al
as 4:2024cv04016
Plaintiff:
Jeramiah J Griffin
Defendant:
Cocoa Butter Lotion, Warren County Sheriff/Jail and Keefe Commissary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erick Dodakian v. Andrew Butters, et al
as 23-15484
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERICK JOHN DODAKIAN
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW BUTTERS, Badge #21242 and CITY OF TEMPE, AKA Tempe Police Department
Defendant:
UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as John Does 1-5, Jane Does 1-5, Black Corporations 1-5 and White Partnerships 1-5
USA v. Winans
as 22-30239
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Dwayne Winans, Jr., also known as Butter Winans
Butters v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2021cv02178
Petitioner:
Robert Patrick Butters
Respondent:
State of Minnesota and Sheriff of Scott County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dodakian v. Butters et al
as 2:2021cv01184
Plaintiff:
Erick John Dodakian
Defendant:
Andrew Butters, Tempe Police Department and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sturgis v. Warden of WCI et al
as 8:2021cv00098
Defendant:
CO II Piel, Sgt. Sgt. Davis, Head of Medical and others
Plaintiff:
Carrington Sturgis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Jenkins v. Woods et al
as 5:2020cv00495
Defendant:
Rhonda Stroup, FNU Smith, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
James Delonjan Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CHRISTOPHER DESHAWN BUTTER v. MICHAEL A. HESTRIN et al
as 5:2020cv01047
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER DESHAWN BUTTER
Defendant:
Mr Michael A Hestrin and ANTONIO E. FIMBRES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUTTER v. HESTRIN et al
as 1:2020cv00986
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER DESHAWN BUTTER
Defendant:
MICHAEL A. HESTRIN and ANTONIO E. FIMBRES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
