Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 859
Davison v. Smith et al
as 5:2024cv00483
Plaintiff: Alonzo Gabriel Davison
Defendant: Clifford J Smith, Scott Rowland, Robert L Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Williams (Bynum)
as 24-1253
Defendant: WILLIAM BYNUM, ALAN ANDERSON, TERRENCE WILLIAMS and others
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rosivelte Lopes v. Victoria Bynum
as 24-6393
Plaintiff: ROSIVELTE LOPES
Defendant: LT. VICTORIA BYNUM
Hawkins v. Bynum
as 5:2024ct03096
Plaintiff: Telyzuan Ja'Keith Hawkins
Defendant: Lt. Bynum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bynum v. Osborne We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00402
Petitioner: Darryl R. Bynum
Respondent: Kenneth Osborne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vaughan et al v. The 3M Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv03084
Plaintiff: Kenneth Vaughan, Dominic Pagliuso, Ralph Hensley II and others
Defendant: The 3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Watford et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv03085
Plaintiff: Joseph Watford, Kenneth Vaughan, Greg Vanhooser and others
Defendant: The 3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Bynum v. City of Bridgton MO. et al
as 4:2024cv00572
Plaintiff: Darryl R. Bynum
Defendant: City of Bridgton MO. and St. Louis County Judicial System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Bynum (INMATE 2)
as 1:2024cv00234
Plaintiff: Thomas C. Williams
Defendant: Mason Bynum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
USA v. Ricky Bynum
as 24-11152
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: RICKY NELSON BYNUM

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?