Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Gordon v. Roberts et al
as 7:2023cv00782
Plaintiff:
Deandre Jaquan Gordon
Defendant:
C/O Roberts, Warden Jeffery C. Artrip, A.W. James Blevins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Redclift v. Schuylkill County et al
as 4:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
Sean Redclift
Defendant:
Schuylkill County, Schuylkill County Prison Board, Eugene Berdanier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Milam v. Pierce et al
as 4:2019cv05013
Plaintiff:
Michael Derrell Milam
Defendant:
Hearing Officer Pierce, C/O James Nored, C/O Matthew Kouri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ismael v. Bell et al
as 2:2016cv00683
Defendant:
Jason Bell, C/O Robert Jones, Captain Kyle and others
Plaintiff:
Prince Miguel Ismael
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Briseno v. Perkins et al
as 2:2014cv02263
Plaintiff:
Juan Briseno
Defendant:
Cpl. Perkins, Sheriff Bukowski, C/O Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reese v. Sgt. Baxley et al
as 3:2014cv00858
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis Reese
Defendant:
Sgt. Baxley, C O Landrum, C O Mayo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crayton v. Sykes et al
as 7:2012cv00291
Defendant:
Sgt. L. Collins, C/O Robert Sykes and Lt. Delmer Tate
Plaintiff:
Phillip Darius Crayton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Banks et al
as 2:2010cv00852
Plaintiff:
Richard King
Defendant:
Edward Banks, Timothy Buchanon, C/O Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fred Wilson v. C/O Robert
as 10-6949
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRED LEWIS WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
C/O ROBERTS, C/O TABOR and SGT. ELY
Defendant:
B. COLLINS, Sgt., M. WILLIAMS, C/O, H. BISHOP, C/O and others
Fred Wilson v. B. Collin
as 10-6431
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRED LEWIS WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
B. COLLINS, Sgt., M. WILLIAMS, C/O, H. BISHOP, C/O and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
