Cases 1 - 10 of 100
DORSEY v. VOIGHCHILD et al
as 2:2026cv00547
Plaintiff:
JAYLON DORSEY
Defendant:
VOIGHCHILD, FISHER, VINGARI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Secrest v. MSPB
as 26-1770
Petitioner:
ROBERT SECREST
Respondent:
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION and MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD
Russell v. State of Alabama et al
as 1:2026cv00041
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Lee Russell, Jr.
Respondent:
State Of Alabama, Tallapoosa County, Steve Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Alston v. State of North Carolina et al
as 1:2026cv00036
Plaintiff:
Calvin B. Alston
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, James Secrest, FNU Watterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(SS) Secrest v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2026cv00104
Plaintiff:
Tony Anthony Secrest
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
APPLEGATE v. CAMPBELL et al
as 2:2025cv00509
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER S. APPLEGATE
Defendant:
CAMPBELL, MS. SECREST, RITTENBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SECREST v. KID
as 1:2025cv02081
Plaintiff:
BRANSTON STONE SECREST
Defendant:
KID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myberg et al v. AGC CHEMICALS AMERICAS, INC. et al
as 2:2025cv11569
Plaintiff:
GARY MYBERG, DAVID REIS, CLIFFORD KAPLAN and others
Defendant:
AGC CHEMICALS AMERICAS, INC., ARKEMA, INC., BASF CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
SECREST v. STEVENS
as 1:2025cv01136
Plaintiff:
BRANSTON STONE SECREST
Defendant:
STEVENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MENDEL v. HENDRICKS COUNTY, INDIANA et al
as 1:2025cv00846
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MENDEL
Defendant:
HENDRICKS COUNTY, INDIANA, ADVANCED CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, INC., JOSHUA WATTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
