Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Mason v. Wright et al
as 1:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Akeem C. Mason
Defendant:
B Wright, C Allen and Wesley Townsend
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Desper v. Sanders et al
as 1:2023cv01038
Plaintiff:
Jamie Paul Desper
Defendant:
S. Sanders, K. Cosby, A. Eure and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen v. Lovett et al
as 5:2022cv00282
Petitioner:
Duane C. Allen
Respondent:
Warden S. Lovett, G.M. Alprin, Muriel Bowser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Randolph v. Allen et al
as 2:2022cv00315
Plaintiff:
Douglas Randolph
Defendant:
Scott C. Allen and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darden v. Campbell et al
as 1:2022cv00793
Plaintiff:
Sharif Darden
Defendant:
Charles Campbell, C Allen and B Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Chappelle v. Campbell et al
as 1:2021cv00863
Plaintiff:
Vernon R. Chappelle, Sr.
Defendant:
Dr. Charles Campbell, Harold W. Clarke, Dara Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dallas v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00349
Defendant:
M Syes, Baldwin, Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Sharon Dallas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
J.O.P. v. DHS
as 21-1187
Plaintiff / Appellee:
J.O.P., E.D.G., M.A.L.C. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MATTHEW C. ALLEN, in his official capacity as Senior Official performing the Duties of the Director of U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, U. S. IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00176
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Davis v. Wilkerson et al
as 3:2021cv00061
Defendant:
Shanae Knox, Joseph Godfrey, Samuel Vazquez and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Antonio Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
