Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Hulett v. Norton
as 4:2022cv00942
Plaintiff:
JAMEY HULETT
Defendant:
GREGORY C NORTON and Gregory C. Norton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Curtis Brown, Sr. v. Court of Appeals
as 22-6135
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CURTIS JEROME BROWN, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
COURT OF APPEALS, JUDGE DAVID C. NORTON, U.S. DISTRICT COURT and others
Brown v. Court of Appeals et al
as 2:2021cv03486
Plaintiff:
Curtis Jerome Brown, Sr
Defendant:
Court of Appeals, Judge David C Norton, U.S. District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis Brown, Sr. v. US
as 21-7156
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CURTIS JEROME BROWN, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES PROBATION DEPARTMENT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT and others
Hill #771743 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv01185
Defendant:
Susan C. Norton, Oaks Correctional Facility and Michigan Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Hill #771743
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Henshaw et al
as 2:2020cv02025
Defendant:
Kankakee County Jail, Jerome Combs Detention Center, . Krumwiede and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah V Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilmore v. Martin County Sheriff Dept. et al
as 0:2019cv01515
Respondent:
Sue Lees, Jeff Marquardt, Martin County Sheriff Dept. and others
Petitioner:
Christopher Gilmore
Defendant:
Debbie Foster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
John Baccus v. Brian Stirling
as 19-6394
Defendant / Appellee:
BRISTOW MARCHANT, DAVID C. NORTON, T. CONWELL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROOSEVELT BACCUS, a/k/a John Roosevelt Baccus, a/k/a John Baccus Roosevelt
Baccus v. Stirling et al
as 9:2018cv01880
Plaintiff:
John Baccus
Defendant:
Brian P Stirling, Dept of Corrections, N.C. Marchant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baccus v. Stirling et al
as 8:2018cv01880
Defendant:
David C Norton, Alan M Wilson, Brian P Stirling and others
Plaintiff:
John Baccus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
