Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Reams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 7:2026cv00587
Plaintiff:
Steven Reams
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Laidley v. Prantco
as 6:2026cv00259
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Laidley
Defendant:
Prantco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00729
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02651
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Boice v. Francoise
as 1:2026cv04218
Plaintiff:
James Boice
Defendant:
Steven Eddy Francoise
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03388
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
JDOG FRANCHISES, LLC et al v. Southside Vet, LLC et al
as 2:2026cv05256
Plaintiff:
JDOG FRANCHISES, LLC and JDog Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Southside Vet, LLC, Southside Strong LLC, Robert R Reichardt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement
Washington v. Aramark
as 3:2026cv50315
Plaintiff:
Eugene Steven Washington
Defendant:
Aramark
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00916
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Neal v. Nationwide Insurance Company et al
as 2:2026cv02410
Plaintiff:
Steven Wyatt Neal
Defendant:
Nationwide Insurance Company, Depositors Insurance Company and Allied Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
