Cases 11 - 20 of 301
Walker v. Kotek
as 6:2023cv01047
Plaintiff:
Ronnie C. Walker
Defendant:
Tina Kotek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meredith et al v. Walker et al
as 6:2023cv00888
Plaintiff:
Todd J Meredith and Karen S Meredith
Defendant:
Donald C Walker and Anita Gale Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A v. Walker et al
as 4:2023cv02023
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A
Defendant:
Takaelyn C. Walker and Wile E Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Walker v. State of Georgia
as 1:2023cv02262
Plaintiff:
Willie C. Walker
Defendant:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blackburn v. Henderson et al
as 1:2023cv02723
Plaintiff:
Brandale M. Blackburn
Defendant:
Marshawn Henderson, Lt. Mr. Torrez, Lt Mr. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spradlin v. Key Installation Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00120
Plaintiff:
Heather Spradlin
Defendant:
Key Installation Services, Inc., James K Walker, Robin C Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Gaddis v. Walker et al
as 5:2023cv10023
Plaintiff:
Devante Gaddis
Defendant:
C. Walker, M. Desco, Unknown Bischer and others
Orozco v. United States
as 5:2022cv07369
Plaintiff:
Victor M. Orozco
Defendant:
United States, A. Ocompo, J. Wooley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22847
Plaintiff:
KEITH C WALKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stevie Stevenson v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 22-56027
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVIE J. STEVENSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, PHD: Secretary of CDCR, SCOTT KERNAN, Undersecretary/Secretary of CDCR, SHANNON SWAIN, Acting Superintendent of Education and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
