Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Davenport v. State Farm Insurance
as 3:2023cv01248
Plaintiff:
Chrishendral C. Davenport
Defendant:
State Farm Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Hellman et al v. Bombardier Recreational Products, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00071
Defendant:
BRP, Inc., Bombardier Recreational Products, Inc., BRP US, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Hellman and Karen Hellman
Cross Defendant:
Mark W. Davenport and Natalie C. Davenport
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Davenport v. Manor
as 3:2021cv00224
Defendant:
Zachary Manor
Plaintiff:
Chrishendral C. Davenport
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVENPORT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv16211
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JARED C DAVENPORT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Dwight Davenport
as 16-4136
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DWIGHT C. DAVENPORT
Cornelius Sephus v. Sam Goggans, et al
as 16-20176
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CORNELIUS RAY SEPHUS
Defendant - Appellee:
SAM GOGGANS, PETE RHAEHN, RUSS RAY and others
Sephus v. Goggans et al
as 4:2015cv02698
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Ray Sephus
Defendant:
Sam Goggans, Pete Rhaehn, Russ Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webb v. Davenport
as 4:2013cv01986
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lee Webb, Jr
Defendant:
C. Davenport
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davenport v. Union Institute & University
as 2:2013cv05863
Plaintiff:
Samuel C. Davenport
Defendant:
Union Institute & University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Local No. 7, Trustees of Operative Plasterers Pension Fund v. Davenport
as 3:2013cv00063
Plaintiff:
Local No. 7, Trustees of Operative Plasterers Pension Fund
Defendant:
Lee C. Davenport
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
