Cases 1 - 10 of 95
Day v. DeVries et al
as 4:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
James C. Day
Defendant:
F. Coulter DeVries, B. Janeen DeVries, Daniel Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Gigena v. Day, et al.
as 24-1212
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL GIGENA
Defendant:
RENEE C. DAY, TODD RIEBE, GREGORY G. GILLOTT and others
(PC) Casity v. Amador County Superior Court et al
as 2:2024cv00450
Plaintiff:
Richard D. Casity
Defendant:
Amador County Superior Court, Renee C. Day and Todd Riebe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. Amador County Superior Court et al
as 2:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Amador County Superior Court, Renee C. Day and S. Hermanson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. Day
as 2:2023cv02644
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Renee C. Day
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PS) Gigena v. Day et al
as 2:2023cv01660
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Gigena
Defendant:
Renee C. Day, Todd D. Riebe, Gregory G. Gillott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Day v. Newton Developments, INC. et al
as 8:2023cv01770
Plaintiff:
James C. Day
Defendant:
Newton Developments, INC., Rosedale Golf Holdings, INC., Rosedale Master Homeowners Association, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shade v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2023cv00192
Plaintiff:
John William Shade, III
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, United States Department of Justice, Jason Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roger Day, Jr. v. T. Watson
as 23-1072
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROGER C. DAY, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
T. J. WATSON, Warden
(PC) Garrett v. Day et al
as 2:2021cv01627
Plaintiff:
Cameo Garrett and Cameo Loree Garrett
Defendant:
Renee C. Day and Randall Shrout
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
