Cases 1 - 10 of 11
James Trainor v. Wellpath, et al
as 23-1771
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES M. TRAINOR
Defendant / Appellee:
WELLPATH, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, CRNP SUTHERLAND and others
Dickens v. The State of Maryland et al
as 1:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
Paul Anthony Dickens, Jr.
Defendant:
The State of Maryland, D.P.S.C.S. Secretary Robert Green, RCI Warden Carlos Bivens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Canter v. The State Of Maryland et al
as 1:2022cv02267
Plaintiff:
Amber Canter
Defendant:
The State Of Maryland, The D.P.S.C.S. Secretary Robert L. Green, Roxbury Correctional Institution Warden, Carlos Bivens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Alim Urmancheev v. Hunter Anglea, et al
as 22-15701
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALIM S. URMANCHEEV
Defendant / Appellee:
HUNTER ANGLEA, C. HAYS, K. PETREY, Sr. and others
Piselli v. Hays et al
as 2:2022cv00103
Plaintiff:
Louis Francis Piselli
Defendant:
C. Hays, Officer Norwood and A. Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarez v. Mendoza et al
as 5:2021cv03764
Petitioner:
Nicholas Alvarez
Respondent:
Warden Mendoza and Case Manager C Hays
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TRAINOR v. WELLPATH et al
as 1:2020cv00225
Defendant:
CRNP BRENDA HARTZELL, C. HAYS, LISA LAMOREAUX and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES TRAINOR and JAMES M. TRAINOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hay v. Bowser et al
as 2:2019cv02088
Defendant:
L. Simon, K. Jackson, T. Blewett and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald C. Hay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Urmancheev v. Anglea, et al.
as 1:2019cv00791
Defendant:
Hunter Anglea, P Johnson, K Petrey, Sr. and others
Plaintiff:
Alim S. Urmancheev
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hay v. Hay
as 2:2012cv01649
Defendant:
Lloyd F. Hay
Plaintiff:
Ronald C. Hay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
