Cases 11 - 20 of 26
TRAINOR v. WELLPATH et al
as 1:2020cv00225
Defendant:
CRNP BRENDA HARTZELL, C. HAYS, LISA LAMOREAUX and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES TRAINOR and JAMES M. TRAINOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hay v. Bowser et al
as 2:2019cv02088
Defendant:
L. Simon, K. Jackson, T. Blewett and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald C. Hay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Urmancheev v. Anglea, et al.
as 1:2019cv00791
Defendant:
Hunter Anglea, P Johnson, K Petrey, Sr. and others
Plaintiff:
Alim S. Urmancheev
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Tufts, et al v. Edward Hay, Jr., et al
as 19-11603
Defendant / Appellant:
PITTS, HAY & HUGENSCHMIDT, P.A. and EDWARD C. HAY, JR.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THOMAS S. TUFTS, TUFTS LAW FIRM, PLLC and THOMAS SCOTT TUFTS
Thomas Tufts, et al v. Edward Hay, Jr., et al
as 19-11496
Defendant / Appellee:
PITTS, HAY & HUGENSCHMIDT, P.A. and EDWARD C. HAY, JR.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS S. TUFTS, TUFTS LAW FIRM, PLLC and THOMAS SCOTT TUFTS
Tufts et al v. Biltmore Investments, LTD. et al
as 6:2018cv00572
Plaintiff:
Thomas S. Tufts and Tufts Law Firm, PLLC
Defendant:
Biltmore Investments, LTD., Edward C. Hay, Jr. and Pitts, Hay & Hugenschmidt, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James C Hays v. Linda B. Bammann et al
as 2:2016cv01142
Defendant:
Linda B. Bammann, James A. Bell, Crandall C. Bowles and others
Plaintiff:
James C. Hays
Hay et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv09616
Plaintiff:
Anna Hay and Gary C. Hay
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hay v. Hay
as 2:2012cv01649
Defendant:
Lloyd F. Hay
Plaintiff:
Ronald C. Hay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hays et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp20286
Plaintiff:
Darren C. Hays and Marsha Hays
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
