Cases 81 - 90 of 125
PERRY v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv56567
Plaintiff:
ALFRED C. PERRY
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Allen v. Woodall et al
as 2:2011cv00209
Plaintiff:
Gary Dewayne Allen
Defendant:
Ronald Woodall, Glorilia C. Perry, Mike Hatten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Jeffrey Perry
as 11-50900
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JEFFREY C. PERRY
Addys Walker v. Charles Canady, et al
as 11-13725
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADDYS T. WALKER
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES T. CANADY, Chief Justice in His Professional and Individual Capacities, BARBARA J. PARIENTE, Justice in Her Professional and Individual Capacities, R. FRED LEWIS, Justice in His Professional and Individual Capacities and others
Perry v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp21093
Plaintiff:
Yvonne C. Perry
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rose Ann Fernandez v. The State of California Government et al
as 5:2011cv00750
Defendant:
Alvara, Camacho, Daniel and others
Plaintiff:
Rose Ann Fernandez
Danilo D Perry et al v. Select Portfolio Servicing Inc et al
as 8:2011cv00697
Defendant:
Credit Suisse Financial Corporation, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc, Select Portfolio Servicing Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Danilo D Perry and Nora C Perry
PERRY et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP
as 2:2011cv64404
Plaintiff:
ERNIE C PERRY and VONA PERRY
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALKER v. CANADY et al
as 4:2011cv00068
Defendant:
CHARLES T CANADY , BARBARA J PARIENTE , R FRED LEWIS and others
Plaintiff:
ADDYS T WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
