Cases 31 - 40 of 98
Ochoa v. Esquivel et al
as 3:2014cv00045
Defendant:
D. Esquivel, McDowell, C. Rice and others
Plaintiff:
Arturo Torres Ochoa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rose v. Rice, et al
as 6:2013cv02251
Defendant:
JILL A RICE and RICHARD C RICE
Plaintiff:
BILL ROSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Green v. State Of Florida et al
as 8:2013cv02877
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee Green
Defendant:
State Of Florida, Robert C. Wilkinson, Jr., Kristina Billings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lebon et al v. Missouri State Public Defender System et al
as 4:2013cv01834
Plaintiff:
Thomas Paul Lebon, Tommy Yarberry, Jacob Meeks and others
Defendant:
Missouri State Public Defender System and Cathy R. Kelly
Movant:
Timothy C. Rice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunham et al v. Jackson County et al
as 3:2013cv00473
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dunham , Donald Barrett , Daniel Bost and others
Defendant:
Jackson County , Larry W Reinhardt , Illinois State Board of Elections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. K2 UNLIMITED, INC. et al
as 1:2013mc00044
Defendant:
211 VENTURES, LLC, ROBERT S. ANDERSON, DIANE GLATFELTER and others
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
US v. Christopher Rice
as 13-4182
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER C. RICE
Glenn Warne, et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
as 13-80037
Plaintiff - Respondent:
GLENN WARNE, CATHERINE WAREN, a married couple, DARRELL PELFREY and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.
Jones et al v. McGuffage et al
as 1:2012cv09997
Plaintiff:
LeAlan Jones , David Sacks , Illinois Green Party and others
Defendant:
William F. McGuffage , Jesse R. Smart , Bryan A. Schneider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
