Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Duarte v. MacRae et al
as 5:2022cv00626
Plaintiff:
Richard F. Duarte, Jr.
Defendant:
Sharon S. MacRae, Robert McClure, Michael D. Granados and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Velasco v. Semple et al
as 3:2019cv00811
Defendant:
Moore, Rembish, Makay and others
Plaintiff:
Victor J. Velasco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Radford v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00188
Plaintiff:
Thomas Radford
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Kenneth Jones, Sandra Giles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muhammad v. Collins et al
as 7:2013cv00011
Defendant:
Lt. Collins, Jean C. Sparks, Richard C. Vorhis and others
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steven Sparks v. Larry Norri
as 10-3801
Petitioner - Appellant:
Steven C. Sparks
Respondent - Appellee:
Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Sparks v. Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections
as 5:2009cv05210
Plaintiff:
Steven C. Sparks
Defendant:
Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Lewis v. Bexar County Adult Detention Center et al
as 5:2009cv00173
Plaintiff:
James Albert Lewis
Defendant:
Bexar County Adult Detention Center, Bexar County Sheriff's Office, FNU Oyervides and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lewis v. Bexar County Adult Detention Center et al
as 4:2009cv00173
Plaintiff:
James Albert Lewis
Defendant:
Bexar County Adult Detention Center, Bexar County Sheriff's Office, FNU Oyervides and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Faith v. Dykes et al
as 5:2007cv00768
Plaintiff:
Douglas D. Faith
Defendant:
FNU Dykes, FNU Persaud and John C. Sparks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
