Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Curtis v. Lackawanna County et al
as 3:2023cv02092
Plaintiff:
Ryan Curtis
Defendant:
Lackawanna County, Wellpath, LLC, Nelson Anthony Iannuzzi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2023cv03851
Plaintiff:
AKHENATON JONES
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER THOMPSON, C.O. JACKSON, NURSE DOES 1-4 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Johnson et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00318
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Alfred Murphy
Defendant:
C.O. Johnson, Gwendolyn Davis, C.O. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yarelis Rivera v. Ronald Edwards, et al
as 23-1286
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YARELIS RIVERA
Defendant / Appellee:
DIRECTOR RONALD P. EDWARDS, C.O. HOUGHTON, SERGEANT PRIEDE and others
RIVERA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2021cv03131
Defendant:
UNIDENTIFIED PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY OFFICERS, HUDSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, CBP OFFICER FINE, in her official and individual capacity and others
Plaintiff:
YARELIS RIVERA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NIXON v. HARPER et al
as 2:2019cv00602
Defendant:
ORLANDO HARPER, JOHN I DOE, C.O. JACKSON and others
Plaintiff:
MARK A. NIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Jones v. Myers et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00355
Defendant:
Sgt. Borders, Lt. Jones, C.O. Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Fitzgerald Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NIXON v. HARPER et al
as 2:2019cv00353
Defendant:
ORLANDO HARPER, JOHN DOE #1, C.O. JACKSON and others
Plaintiff:
MARK A. NIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Carter v. Captian Jordan et al
as 1:2018cv08577
Defendant:
Captian Jordan, C.O. Sanchez, C.O. Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
David Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burke v. Dunn et al
as 4:2018cv01485
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, C.O. Turnbull, C.O. Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Sahking Burke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
