Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Jackson v. Camden Police Department et al
as 3:2025cv13415
Plaintiff:
Soloman Jackson and Soloman James Jackson
Defendant:
Camden Police Department, Det. C.J. Olson, Roderick Todd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Matthew Jones v. Judicial Branch, et al
as 25-1341
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JONES
Defendant:
JUDICIAL BRANCH, CARNEGIE HALL, SEARS TOWER and others
Davis v. City of Camden, Arkansas et al
as 1:2025cv01011
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis
Defendant:
City of Camden, Arkansas, Camden Police Department and Detective Scott Bodenheimer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
JONES v. THE JUDICIAL BRANCH et al
as 1:2025cv00040
Defendant:
Nanticoke Hospital, Delaware Psychiatric Center, Dr. Luis David and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WARD v. CAMDEN POLICE DEPARTMENT, ET AL.
as 2:2024cv04743
Defendant:
CAMDEN POLICE DEPARTMENT, ET AL.
Plaintiff:
CARLET DEETTA WARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jamor Demby v. Camden County Metro Police Department
as 24-2590
Defendant:
CAMDEN POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
JAMOR J. DEMBY
Henry v. Spicer et al
as 1:2022cv00756
Plaintiff:
Nelson T. Henry
Defendant:
David Spicer, Logan Spicer, City of Dover Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HILL v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY et al
as 1:2022cv03558
Plaintiff:
Taron Hill
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, CAMDEN COUNTY, CITY OF CAMDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ward v. Camden Police Department et al
as 1:2021cv01758
Plaintiff:
Carlet D. Ward
Defendant:
Camden Police Department, Town of Camden, Wayne White and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Allen Garrett v. City of Camden, et al
as 21-1132
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CAMDEN, COUNTY OF CAMDEN, SEAN DONATO, #350 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALLEN DUPREE GARRETT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
