Cases 11 - 20 of 29,612
Vila v. Fashivly, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Carlos Vila
Defendant:
Fashivly, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Mariama Moore v. Hamline University, et al
as 24-1959
Plaintiff:
Mariama Djenaba Moore
Defendant:
Hamline University, Deans of Students, Hamline University Residential Life and others
ALVES v. WARDEN et al
as 2:2024cv05876
Petitioner:
CARLOS S. ALVES
Respondent:
WARDEN, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez et al v. LNU et al
as 1:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
Justin A. Hernandez, Carlos Mondragon, Javier Sanchez and others
Defendant:
FNU LNU, FNU Lucero, FNU Rosenbaucher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Escobar Chacon et al v. SW Florida Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
Alonso Escobar Chacon, Jose Hernan Chacon, Ronald Aron Chacon Mejia and others
Defendant:
SW Florida Services, Inc. and Vittorio Bonanno
United States v. Carlos Morales Mariscal
as 24-1944
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Carlos Ulices Morales Mariscal, also known as Carlos Uleces Rodriges Gamboa, also known as Pecha
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21725
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
