Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 6,752
Cantu-Cox v. USA
as 2:2024cv01125
Petitioner: Carlos Mario Cantu-Cox
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate
Hernandez v. Stein et al
as 1:2024cv00367
Petitioner: CARLOS HERNANDEZ and RA SAADI LENNOX HERNANDEZ EL
Respondent: JOSHUA H. STEIN, JAMIE BULLARD and NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
US v. Carlos Benson
as 24-6415
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: CARLOS ANTOINE BENSON
Dorado v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00154
Petitioner: Carlos Dorado
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Miranda-Espinoza v. USA
as 2:2024cv01008
Petitioner: Jesus Emilio Miranda-Espinoza, Carlos Armenta-Vasquez, Jesus Miranda-Espinoza and others
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Morinville v. Upstate Correctional Facility RRU et al
as 9:2024cv00600
Plaintiff: Carlos Morinville
Defendant: Upstate Correctional Facility RRU, Doe #1, Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21692
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21656
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
KENON v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2024cv00186
Plaintiff: CARLOS S KENON
Defendant: STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21643
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?