Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Justin Shaffer v. Daryl Bloom, et al
as 24-1828
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN ERIC SHAFFER
Defendant:
DARYL F. BLOOM, Assistant Supervisor Attorney Prosecutor, CARLO D. MARCHIOLI, Assistant USA Attorney, JOHN C. GURGANUS, JR., United States Attorney (Primary Defendant) and others
William Himchak, III v. Superintendent Greene SCI, et al
as 22-2947
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM A. HIMCHAK, III
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI, ALAN ROBINSON, Office of Chief Counsel, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and others
Himchak III v. Zaken et al
as 2:2022cv00907
Petitioner:
William A. Himchak III
Respondent:
M. ZAKEN, PAROLE BOARD, ALAN ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Himchak III v. Zaken et al
as 3:2022cv00561
Petitioner:
William A. Himchak III
Respondent:
M. Zaken, Parole Board, Alan Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BRINSON v. CITY OF NEWARK et al
as 2:2020cv09606
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWARK, AIDA L MELENDEZ, YASIR W HARRISON and others
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA BRINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv03748
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
MALDONADO v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv07682
Plaintiff:
CARLOS D. MALDONADO
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02161
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CRUZ v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2015cv01837
Plaintiff:
CARLOS D. CRUZ
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SOLIS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv49931
Plaintiff:
CARLOS D. SOLIS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
