Cases 41 - 50 of 85
Smith et al v. Washington State et al
as 3:2014cv05974
Plaintiff:
Robert Smith, Michael Johnson, Doug Car and others
Defendant:
Washington State, Washington State Attorney General's Office, Bob Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SLADE v. HARRIS et al
as 1:2014cv00970
Plaintiff:
BELINDA SLADE
Defendant:
CATHY HARRIS and SPENCE HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Payne v. Strong et al
as 3:2014cv05854
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Bryant Payne
Defendant:
Mark Strong, Dorian Diaz, Byron Eagle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv26880
Plaintiff:
Cathy Harris and Kenneth Harris
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bob Pugh v. Susan Dreyfus, et al
as 14-35476
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOB A. PUGH
Defendant:
SUSAN DREYFUS, Director, Washington Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS)
Defendant - Appellee:
DON GAUNTZ, Executive Director, SCC, CATHY HARRIS, Executive Director of Island Operations and Security, SCC, HOLLY COELLIS, Director of Treatment, SCC and others
Harris v. KLUV Group, LLC et al
as 3:2014cv00406
Plaintiff:
Cathy Harris
Defendant:
KLUV Group, LLC, Jagraj Cheema and Sukhdev S. Thind
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Harris v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv14916
Plaintiff:
Cathy Harris
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Calhoun v. Bailey et al
as 3:2014cv05089
Plaintiff:
Rickey Calhoun
Defendant:
William Bailey , Cathi Harris and James Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sorenson et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2013cv32463
Plaintiff:
Dixie Sorenson , Patricia Ann Powers , Nancy Hart and others
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Donaghe v. Diaz et al
as 3:2013cv06040
Plaintiff:
Sam Donaghe
Defendant:
Wes Diaz , Daryl Weeks , Cathi Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
