Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Nathaniel Rice v. Kevin Auten
as 22-7112
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN AUTEN, Sheriff, K-9 OFFICER JOHN DOE, K-9 Officer, PUBLIC DEFENDER JANE DOE, State of NC Public Defenders Office and others
Defendant:
SGT JOHN DOE, Sergeant, JOHN DOE #2, Arresting Officer/Deptuy Sheriff and JD, Deputy Sheriff Rowan County
FRAZIER v. KUHN et al
as 2:2022cv02781
Plaintiff:
JASPER FRAZIER
Defendant:
VICTORIA L. KUHN, ROBERT E. CARTER, ASST. SUPT. ANTHONY DEGNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cano v. Doe et al
as 1:2021cv01074
Defendant:
Chaplain Herber, Chaplain John Doe, Warden Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Taylor James Cano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Barnes, et al
as 21-1066
Defendant / Appellee:
LT. WENCE, Chaplain John Doe and SGT. JUAN BARNES
Defendant:
MICHAEL HALE and WARDEN RYAN LONG
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Rupert v. St. Lucie County Jail et al
as 2:2020cv14183
Defendant:
St. Lucie County Jail, Chaplain John Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Prentis Rupert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2019cv00473
Defendant:
STATE CHAPLAIN JOHN DOE, THE STATE OF GEORGIA, JAMES D SMITH and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID TIMOTHY MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schrock v. Aramark LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00510
Defendant:
John(s) or Jane(s) Does, Captain Smiley, Ofc Rojo and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Alan Schrock, Jr
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TONSIL v. QUIGGLEY et al
as 5:2016cv06402
Plaintiff:
ERIC COURTNEY TONSIL
Defendant:
JANINE QUIGGLEY , B.C.J.S. , JOHN - DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. The State of New York et al
as 1:2013cv00003
Plaintiff:
Carl Williams
Defendant:
The State of New York, Corrections Counselors, S. Amoia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
