Cases 61 - 70 of 107
Fields vs. McKesson Corporation
as CAN/4:13-cv-03050
Plaintiff:
James Fields , Robert Ford , Richard Fulkerson and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Hamilton v. Colvin
as 1:2013cv00072
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Charles Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Amatucci v. Hamilton et al
as 1:2013fp00087
Plaintiff:
Josephine Amatucci
Defendant:
Brian Black, Charles Hamilton and Wolfeboro, Town of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Amatucci v. Hamilton et al
as 1:2012cv00448
Plaintiff:
Josephine Amatucci
Defendant:
Brian Black, Charles Hamilton, Robert Varney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hamilton v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2012cv01390
Plaintiff:
Charles Hamilton
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Pat Quinn, Attorney General of Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amatucci v. Hamilton, et al
as 12-1951
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPHINE AMATUCCI
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES HAMILTON, JAMES O'BRIEN, JESSE FRIEDMAN and others
Conn v. Whole Space Industries, LTD et al
as 3:2012cv00247
Plaintiff:
Courtney Conn
Defendant:
Whole Space Industries, LTD , Meijer, Inc. , Charles Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Louis Hamilton, II v. USA, et al
as 12-40403
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS CHARLES HAMILTON, II, Negro African American, suing on behalf of all other African American (Negroes) Americans in and for the United States of America
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ANDREW JOHNSON, President and RUTHERFORD B. HAYES
Hamilton v. Johnson
as 4:2012cv01122
Plaintiff:
Louis Charles Hamilton, II
Defendant:
Donnell Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. North Texas State Hospital et al
as 7:2012cv00053
Plaintiff:
Louis Charles Hamilton
Defendant:
North Texas State Hospital, Jim Smitt, Keli Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
