Cases 31 - 40 of 393
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00226
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jones et al v. Puyallup Tribe et al
as 3:2022cv05222
Plaintiff:
Marcus Jones, Charles Jones and Tom Jones
Defendant:
Puyallup Tribe, Washington State Capitol, Bank Tapco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. CORIZON HEALTH INC et al
as 3:2022cv04883
Plaintiff:
CHARLES JONES
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH INC and RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv00977
Plaintiff:
CHARLES JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jamie J. Johnson v. Officer Charles Jones et al
as 5:2021cv02034
Petitioner:
Jamie J. Johnson
Respondent:
Charles Jones, Lamont Tarrell Arnold and SBPD
Defendant:
Timathy Saluing Tommas, San Bernardino PD Full County and San Bernardino People
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Jones et al
as 3:2021cv01982
Plaintiff:
Jamie J. Johnson
Defendant:
Officer Charles Jones, Lamont Tarrell Arnold and SBPD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2021cv02996
Petitioner:
Brian Charles Jones
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2021cv00233
Petitioner:
Brian Charles Jones
Respondent:
TDCJ-CID and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Kijakazi
as 1:2021cv02783
Plaintiff:
Kevin Charles Jones
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
JONES JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv66413
Plaintiff:
CHARLES JONES JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
