Cases 21 - 30 of 279
MACNEIL v. WARREN et al
as 1:2022cv05891
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER C. MACNEIL
Defendant:
CHARLES WARREN, ROBERT SMITH and KRISTINA SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HANNAH v. WARREN et al
as 1:2022cv05751
Plaintiff:
JULE LOREN HANNAH
Defendant:
ACTING WARDEN CHARLES WARREN, EX WARDEN ROBERT SMITH and EX MEDICAL DIRECTOR KRISTINA SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WARREN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12992
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WARREN and CHARLES WARREN, II
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
US v. Charles Whitt
as 22-4451
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES WARREN WHITT
MCCLAIN v. WARREN et al
as 1:2022cv04547
Plaintiff:
WAYNE ALLEN MCCLAIN
Defendant:
ACTING WARDEN CHARLES WARREN, EX WARDEN ROBERT SMITH and EX MEDICAL DIRECTOR KRISTINA SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STERLING v. WARREN et al
as 1:2022cv04202
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA M. STERLING
Defendant:
CHARLES WARREN and EVELYN OLSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAYS v. WARREN et al
as 1:2022cv03700
Plaintiff:
RYAN MAYS
Defendant:
ACTING WARDEN CHARLES WARREN, EX-WARDEN ROBERT SMITH and EX-MEDICAL DIRECTOR KRISTINA SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEAD v. SMITH et al
as 1:2022cv02189
Plaintiff:
JAMES MEAD
Defendant:
RICHARD SMITH, CHARLES WARREN, WARDEN EUGENE CALDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warren v. Whitcomb et al
as 2:2022cv00063
Plaintiff:
Charles Warren
Defendant:
Scottie Whitcomb, Laura Rash and Derrick Times
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
DEVAULT v. WARREN et al
as 1:2022cv00492
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN DEVAULT
Defendant:
CHARLES WARREN, OSCAR AVILES and EVELYN OLSEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
