Cases 1 - 10 of 1,015
Jimenez v. United States Department of Transportation, et al.
as 24-2557
Plaintiff:
MARK JIMENEZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, ELAINE L. CHO, Hon. and PETE BUTTIGIEG
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02869
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02834
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Cho v. General Motors Company
as 8:2024cv00819
Plaintiff:
Judy Cho
Defendant:
General Motors Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Murphy v. Washington et al
as 2:2024cv10945
Plaintiff:
Timothy Murphy
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Jong Choi, Rickey Coleman and others
Sandoval-Cho, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2252
Petitioner:
MYLVIA SACELA SANDOVAL-CHO and DIEGO ALEXANDER MELCHOR-SANDOVAL
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Alexander v. Springer et al
as 3:2024cv02139
Plaintiff:
Carrie Alexander
Defendant:
Daniel D. Springer, Enrique Salem, Peter Solvik and others
Bradshaw v. Annucci
as 24-819
Defendant:
GRAVELL, Mental Health Therapist, Upstate Correctional Facility, UHLER, Superintendent, Upstate Correctional Facility, R. CANTWELL, Commissioner Hearing Officer, Upstate Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
JAY BRADSHAW
Hawkins v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of the Northwest et al
as 3:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
Kathy Mae Hawkins
Defendant:
Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of the Northwest an Oregon nonprofit corporation doing business as Kaiser Permanente, Sungeyun David Cho, Covidien Sales LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Murphy v. Washington et al
as 2:2024cv10735
Plaintiff:
Timothy Murphy
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Jong Choi, Rickey Coleman and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
