Cases 31 - 40 of 40
CROOKS v. JONES et al.
as 3:2017cv00037
Plaintiff:
THERENCE W CROOKS
Defendant:
JULIE JONES, RICK SCOTT, KATE GLUSTAFSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy No. FRW19006 v. George Chopp d/b/a Freehand Concepts, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv03448
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy No. FRW19006
Defendant:
George Chopp d/b/a Freehand Concepts, Inc. and Bomasada Investment Group, II, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Chopp v. Sentinel Insurance Company, LTD
as 2:2014cv00084
Plaintiff:
Jesse Chopp
Defendant:
Sentinel Insurance Company, LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hausken v. Vande Weye et al
as 3:2013cv05560
Plaintiff:
Phillip Burton Hausken
Defendant:
Kevin Vande Weye, Judy Warnick, Frank Chopp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John F Chopp v. Michael J Astrue
as 5:2012cv00291
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
John F Chopp
Chopp v. Keffer
as 4:2011cv00595
Petitioner:
Tonya Denise Chopp
Respondent:
Warden Joe Keffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CHOPP v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv37635
Plaintiff:
JOHN C. CHOPP
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Peck et al v. Chopp et al
as 1:2009cv00621
Plaintiff:
Paul Peck and Richard Brown
Defendant:
Anthony Chopp, Jeffrey Shunk, Patricia McCullough and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Doris Sagastume et al v. Statewide Enterprise, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv08111
Defendant:
Statewide Enterprise, Inc., Vanowen Apts. LP and Marc Chopp
Plaintiff:
Carlos Rapalo and Doris Sagastume
Undetermined:
Attorney Settlement Officer and Fred Turner Ashley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
