Cases 1 - 10 of 12
COPELAND v. PLUMMER LONG et al
as 1:2020cv01999
Defendant:
SARA SCOTT, ROBERT CARTER, STANLEY KNIGHT and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER COPELAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COPELAND v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv55219
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER COPELAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meyer, Lytton, Allen, Whitaker, Inc. v. Copeland Engineering, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00910
Defendant:
Oscar Chaparro, Christopher Copeland, Merideth Copeland and others
Plaintiff:
Meyer, Lytton, Allen, Whitaker, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (a) Injunction against Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
FILING ERROR
as 1:2016cv00472
Defendant:
City of San Antonio Development Services Department and Michael Shannon
Plaintiff:
Christopher Copeland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Copeland, e al v. City of San Antonio, et al
as 5:2016cv00373
Defendant:
City of San Antonio Development Services Department and Michael Shannon
Plaintiff:
Christopher Copeland and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Costa Layman, LLC v. Copeland
as 1:2013cv24309
Plaintiff:
Costa Layman, LLC
Defendant:
Christopher Copeland and Metrolina Greenhouses, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Copeland v. Costa Layman LLC
as 8:2013cv03163
Plaintiff:
Christopher Copeland
Defendant:
Costa Layman LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Copeland v. Irwin Research and Development Inc
as 6:2012cv02873
Plaintiff:
Christopher Copeland
Defendant:
Irwin Research and Development Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States v. Copeland
as 10-1337
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER COPELAND
Copeland v. Davis
as 1:2010cv00533
Petitioner:
Christopher Copeland
Respondent:
Blake Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
