Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Grimes v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00959
Plaintiff:
Christopher Grimes
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
GRIMES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv24001
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER GRIMES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Transamerica Life Insurance Company v. Davis et al
as 3:2023cv01826
Plaintiff:
Transamerica Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Jeffrey Davis, Christopher Grimes and Rita N Bingham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Christopher Grimes v. Brian Kibler
as 21-56353
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER GRIMES
Respondent / Appellee:
BRIAN KIBLER, Warden, Warden High Desert State Prison
Christopher Grimes v. Brian Kibler
as 2:2021cv05735
Petitioner:
Christopher Grimes
Respondent:
Warden Brian Kibler and Brian Kibler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GRIMES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv74022
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER GRIMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grimes v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2020cv00072
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Ryan Christopher Grimes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grimes v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv04621
Plaintiff:
Ryan Christopher Grimes
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nowlin v. Oklahoma City City of et al
as 5:2017cv00194
Plaintiff:
David Nowlin
Defendant:
Oklahoma City City of and Christopher Grimes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Christopher Grimes v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2016cv01031
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, Does, Refugio Garza and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Grimes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
