Cases 31 - 40 of 59
Gaines v. Whitley
as 7:2018cv00417
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Gaines
Defendant:
James F. Whitley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Alan Metzgar v. KBR, Inc.
as 17-1960
Not Classified By Court:
In re: KBR, INCORPORATED, Burn Pit Litigation
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALAN METZGAR, RWT 09-744, PAUL PARKER, and all others similarly situated: RWT 09-744, JOSHUA ELLER, RWT 09-2748 and others
Alan Metzgar v. KBR, Inc.
as 17-1960
:
In re: KBR, INCORPORATED, Burn Pit Litigation
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALAN METZGAR, RWT 09-744, PAUL PARKER, and all others similarly situated: RWT 09-744, JOSHUA ELLER, RWT 09-2748 and others
Defendant - Appellee:
KBR, INCORPORATED, KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT, LLC, HALLIBURTON COMPANY and others
Defendant:
ERKA LTD
Bonner v. Parker et al
as 7:2017cv01820
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Bonner
Defendant:
Todd Parker, Christopher Michael Bain, Keith Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Christopher Michael Salisbury
as 17-4048
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL SALISBURY
Hardy v. USA
as 4:2016cv00129
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Christopher Michael Hardy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ATHEY v. USA
as 1:2016cv00654
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL ATHEY
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Wikoff et al v. Western Regional Jail Medical Staff et al
as 3:2016cv04542
Plaintiff:
Michael David Wikoff, Christopher Michael Meyers and Zachary Fields
Defendant:
Western Regional Jail Medical Staff, Blevins, Morrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Batten v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv00997
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Batten
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
US v. Christopher Connelly
as 15-6911
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL CONNELLY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
