Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv06186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
SHELTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv20221
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SHELTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SHELTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2023cv00554
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SHELTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SHELTON v. USA
as 1:2023cv00992
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER SHELTON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Shelton v. Crow
as 5:2022cv00893
Petitioner:
Christopher Shelton
Respondent:
Director DOC Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shelton v. Corporal Burr et al
as 4:2022cv00234
Plaintiff:
Johne Christopher Shelton
Defendant:
Corporal Burr, Security Officer Minyard, Security Officer King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHELTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv64574
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SHELTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tilley v. Shelton et al
as 1:2020cv10638
Plaintiff:
Lisa Tilley and Kendall Moultrie
Defendant:
Verizon Communicaitons, Inc., Veronica Peters, CWA Local 1101 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Shelton v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2020cv00093
Plaintiff:
Jammie Christopher Shelton
Defendant:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes v. Jeffreys
as 1:2020cv02137
Plaintiff:
Marcus Barnes, Corey Crowe, Joshua Huddleston and others
Defendant:
Director of IDOC Rob Jeffreys
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
