Cases 71 - 80 of 393
Bearup v. Cintas Corporation
as 1:2021cv00151
Plaintiff:
Sonia Bottona, Thomas Bearup, Jr and Antonia (Tonya) Osborne
Defendant:
Cintas Corporation No 2 and Cintas Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lopez v. Cintas
as 21-20089
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Douglas A. Lopez
Defendant / Appellee:
Cintas Corporation
Raymond Hawkins, et al v. Cintas Corporation, et al
as 21-3156
Defendant / Appellant:
INVESTMENT POLICY COMMITTEE, SCOTT D. FARMER, CINTAS CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ROBIN LUNG, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and RAYMOND HAWKINS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Maury Regional Hospital v. Cintas Corporation
as 1:2021cv00005
Defendant:
Cintas Corporation and Cintas Corporation No.
Plaintiff:
Maury Regional Hospital doing business as Maury Regional Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Coleman v. Cintas Corporate Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv01815
Plaintiff:
Leona Coleman
Defendant:
Cintas Corporate Services, Inc., Ryan Francis, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv01321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cintas Corporation v. G&S Technology, Inc.
as 0:2020cv02461
Plaintiff:
Cintas Corporation
Defendant:
G&S Technology, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Porfirio Landeros v. Cintas Corporation No. 3 et al
as 2:2020cv09931
Plaintiff:
Porfirio Landeros
Defendant:
Cintas Corporation No. 3, Cintas Corporation No. 2, DOES 1 through 100, inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv03490
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
