Cases 61 - 70 of 118
Barrow v. Clark County Jail et al
as 3:2016cv05439
Plaintiff:
Keon W Barrow
Defendant:
Clark County Jail, Clark County Sheriff, Correct Care Solutions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHAFIN v. CLARKE COUNTY JAIL
as 3:2016cv00046
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CHAFIN
Defendant:
CLARKE COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disability Rights Washington v. Atkins et al
as 3:2016cv05329
Plaintiff:
Disability Rights Washington
Defendant:
Chuck E Atkins , Ric Bishop , Mike Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Osborne v. Clark County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2016cv05307
Plaintiff:
Lucas Osborne
Defendant:
Clark County Sheriff's Office, Clark County Jail, Mike Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holloway et al v. Warden Clark County Jail et al
as 2:2015cv02494
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks and Lakeisha Nicole Holloway
Respondent:
Warden Clark County Jail
Defendant:
Warden County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Burgess v. Clark County Jail Sheriff Office
as 3:2015cv05895
Petitioner:
Richard Burgess
Respondent:
Clark County Jail Sheriff Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Burgess v. Vancouver Police Department et al
as 3:2015cv05844
Plaintiff:
Richard S Burgess
Defendant:
Vancouver Police Department , Brian Ford, Devon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Clark County Jail et al
as 6:2015cv06119
Plaintiff:
Gerry Dean Miller
Defendant:
Clark County Jail, J Watson, James Mayhue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Clark County Jail et al
as 4:2015cv00701
Plaintiff:
Gerry Dean Miller
Defendant:
Clark County Jail, Jason Watson, James Mayhue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHAFIN v CLARKE COUNTY JAIL, et al
as 3:2015cv00109
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CHAFIN
Defendant:
CLARKE COUNTY JAIL and ARMOR CORRECTIONAL HEALTH INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
