Cases 1 - 10 of 8,208
Coleman v. John Doe
as 3:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Coleman
Defendant:
John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deas v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County et al
as 5:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Deandrae Deas
Defendant:
Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kenneth Atkerson, Jeramie Waak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Camp
as 5:2024cv00219
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Howard
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Camp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Coleman-Bey v. Hendrickson et al
as 6:2024cv03128
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee Coleman-Bey
Defendant:
Michael D Hendrickson, Michael L. Parson, Jeffrey Bates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Rardin
as 2:2024cv11111
Petitioner:
Rashaud L. Coleman
Respondent:
FCI Milan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Snedeker v. State of Colorado, et al
as 24-1173
Plaintiff:
BRADFORD WAYNE SNEDEKER, SR.
Defendant:
STATE OF COLORADO, ANJALI NANDI, DENISE MERTZ and others
Fountain v. Rupert
as 24-40267
Plaintiff:
Freddie Fountain, and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
John Rupert, Warden, Coffield Unit, Brian Collier, Executive Director, Jeffrey Richardson, Assistant Warden and others
Grammar v. Warden, FCC Coleman Low
as 5:2024cv00189
Petitioner:
Donny Grammar
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wehner v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 5:2024cv00203
Petitioner:
Thomas Joseph Wehner, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Coleman v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2024cv00764
Petitioner:
Kyrel L. Coleman
Respondent:
James Dzurenda and Jeremy Bean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
