Cases 41 - 50 of 422
Cook v. Daviess County, Kentucky
as 4:2022cv00138
Plaintiff:
Terry W. Cook, Jr.
Defendant:
Daviess County, Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker #932129 et al v. Simon et al
as 1:2022cv00848
Plaintiff:
Estes Walker #932129
Defendant:
P.C. Simon, Unknown Cook, Unknown Bledsoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Boss et al
as 1:2022cv01535
Plaintiff:
John Cook
Defendant:
David Boss, Kelly Vasas, Jonathon Romanin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cook v. Bowers
as 3:2022cv01418
Plaintiff:
Johnnie D. Cook
Defendant:
Mrs. Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Williams et al v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00571
Plaintiff:
Brenda Williams, Christa Cook, Christopher Derick Montgomery and others
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., CoreCivic of Tennessee, Damon T. Hininger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. DeWine et al
as 3:2022cv01292
Plaintiff:
Matthew Cook
Defendant:
Governor Mike DeWine, Dave Yost, Director Annette Chambers-Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Atkins #742687 v. Dawdy et al
as 2:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
Allen Atkins #742687
Defendant:
David Dawdy, Unknown Party #1, J. Fair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook #290601 v. Washington et al
as 2:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
Daniel Cook #290601
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Unknown Deangelou, Unknown Party #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook #290601 v. Corizon Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00629
Plaintiff:
Daniel Cook #290601
Defendant:
Corizon Inc. and Unknown Schad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook #290601 v. Huss et al
as 2:2022cv00142
Plaintiff:
Daniel Cook #290601
Defendant:
Erica Huss and Unknown Party #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
