Cases 1 - 10 of 100
COPPOLA et al v. CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, INC.
as 1:2026cv14108
Defendant:
CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, INC.
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA COPPOLA and MICHAEL COPPOLA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Coppola et al v. Phillips Global, Inc.
as 1:2026cv00095
Plaintiff:
Angela D. Coppola and Andrea D. Lester
Defendant:
Phillips Global, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Coppola v. Renaissance Behavioral Health, LLC et al
as 1:2026cv04320
Plaintiff:
Mr. Rafael Coppola
Defendant:
Renaissance Behavioral Health, LLC, Felita Anane and Francine Bio-Gilyard
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Nesbitt v. NYPD et al
as 1:2026cv06206
Plaintiff:
Sabrina Lady Nesbitt
Defendant:
NYPD, Kings County Sheriff's Dept., President Donald John Trump and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mian Arif v. Ralph Stephen Coppola
as 3:2026cv00700
Plaintiff:
Mian Arif
Defendant:
Ralph Stephen Coppola
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Marie Antoinette Bridal Salon, LLC et al
as 3:2026mc00112
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Marie Antoinette Bridal Salon, LLC and Theresa Coppola
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Hancock v. The City of Rochester et al
as 6:2026cv06923
Plaintiff:
Khahil Hancock
Defendant:
The City Of Rochester, Zachary Costello, Jeremy E Startare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mascagno et al v. FCA US, LLC
as 1:2026cv01080
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Mascagno, Robert Coburn, Michelle Coburn and others
Defendant:
FCA US, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
COPPOLA v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 2:2026cv06083
Plaintiff:
GIUSEPPE COPPOLA
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Burnett v. Coppola
as 26-1696
Plaintiff:
TONY BURNETT
Defendant:
COPPOLA, N. GENTILE, NICHOLAS KIEFFER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
