Cases 81 - 90 of 268
Devin Andrich v. Corizon, LLC, et al
as 19-16826
Defendant / Appellee:
JANE DOE COONS, CORIZON, LLC, JANE DOE ELLIS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEVIN ANDRICH
Draper v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2019cv06116
Defendant:
T K Bredeman, J. Cofield, Brenda Shira and others
Plaintiff:
Russell Draper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Inch et al
as 3:2019cv00997
Defendant:
Mark Inch, Dr. Erron Campbell, Dr. E. L. Toledo and others
Plaintiff:
Perry Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willie Jefferson, Jr. v. Mark Sevier, et al
as 19-2605
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK R. SEVIER, Superintendent, in his individual and official capacities as Superintendent of Westville Correctional Facility, ANDREW LIAW, Doctor and CORIZON, LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIE F. JEFFERSON, JR.
Becker v. Corizon, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv04167
Defendant:
Michael Whitlock, Corizon, LLC, Bonnie Brennen and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Becker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. MCNEIL et al
as 4:2019cv00345
Defendant:
CORIZON, LLC, MARIA LILLIANA GARCIA, WALTER A MCNEIL and others
Plaintiff:
BRYANT NEIL BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yordt v. Ryan
as 2:2019cv04783
Defendant:
Centurion of Arizona LLC, Corizon LLC and Charles L Ryan
Plaintiff:
Jason W Yordt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POWELL v. JONES et al
as 4:2019cv00326
Defendant:
J BURGOS-POLO, B EDOURD, CORIZON LLC and others
Plaintiff:
EDDIE POWELL, SR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Corizon LLC et al
as 4:2019cv00361
Defendant:
Xuong Wilkinson, Corizon LLC, Christopher Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W Reed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Terrill v. City of St. Charles et al
as 4:2019cv01897
Plaintiff:
Michael Terrill
Defendant:
St. Charles County Department of Corrections, Crawford Larry, City of St. Charles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
