Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Stricklin v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
as 5:2014cv00039
Plaintiff:
Joshua A Stricklin
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Correction, Correctional Medical Services Inc, Corizon Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stricklin v. Correctional Medical Services Inc et al
as 5:2012cv00436
Plaintiff:
Joshua A Stricklin
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services Inc, Rector and Bowman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald v. Correctional Medical Services Inc et al
as 5:2012cv00340
Plaintiff:
Isaac M McDonald
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services Inc, Roland Anderson, Dorothy Yarbrough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Blair et al
as 3:2012cv00150
Plaintiff:
Marcus L Daniels
Defendant:
Blair, Zane Boyd, Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conway v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2011cv00142
Plaintiff:
Byron L Conway
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Correctional Medical Services Inc, Larry Norris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc. et al
as 6:2011cv06036
Plaintiff:
Elton Bennie Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Inc., Roland Anderson, W. D. Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Brewer et al
as 5:2011cv00078
Plaintiff:
Harold Henderson
Defendant:
David Brewer, Larry Norris, Roland Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conway v. Anderson et al
as 5:2011cv00051
Plaintiff:
Byron L Conway
Defendant:
Roland Anderson , Joseph Hughes and Correctional Medical Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant v. Correctional Medical Services Inc
as 5:2010cv00368
Plaintiff:
Abraham Grant, Sr
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earls v. Hughes et al
as 5:2010cv00299
Plaintiff:
Jacob Thomas Earls
Defendant:
Joe Hughes, De Saint Felix, Dorothy Langel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
