Cases 1 - 10 of 678
KHEOP v. USA
as 1:2024cv00911
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ABDULLAH KHEOP, Michael Cosby and Michael E. Johnson
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Cosby v. Banuelos, et al
as 24-1247
Petitioner:
GREGORY D. COSBY, AKA Gregory D. Crosby
Respondent:
M. BANUELOS, DHO Officer, A. CIOLLI, Warden, J. POTTER, Correctional Officer and others
Crosby (PS) v. Ciolli et al
as 1:2024cv01435
Petitioner:
Gregory D Crosby and Gregory D Cosby
Respondent:
A. Ciolli and M. Banuelos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00333
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
United States of America v. Cosby
as 3:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Willie Cosby, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Serignese v. Cosby, Jr.
as 2:2024cv00794
Plaintiff:
Therese Pickling Serignese
Defendant:
William H Cosby, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Cosby v. Ciolli, et al
as 24-1167
Petitioner:
GREGORY D. COSBY, AKA Gregory D. Crosby
Respondent:
M. BANUELOS, DHO Officer, A. CIOLLI, Warden, J. POTTER, Correctional Officer and others
Crosby (PS) v. Ciolli et al
as 1:2024cv01128
Petitioner:
Gregory D. Crosby and Gregory D. Cosby
Respondent:
A. Ciolli and Fed. Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cosby v. Ciolli, et al
as 24-1146
Petitioner:
GREGORY D. COSBY, a/k/a Gregory D. Crosby
Respondent:
A. CIOLLI, Warden, AW PROGRAMS COMPLEX, CMC COMPLEX and others
CTM Holdings, LLC v. United States Department of Agriculture et al
as 6:2024cv02016
Plaintiff:
CTM Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture, Thomas J Vilsack, Natural Resources Conservation Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
