Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 73
ROBERSON v. COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX et al
as 3:2024cv09323
Defendant: COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX and JOHN AND JANE DOE 1 THROUGH 10
Plaintiff: HAKEEM ROBERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Northern Virginia Hemp v. Commonwealth of VA
as 23-2192
Plaintiff / Appellant: NORTHERN VIRGINIA HEMP AND AGRICULTURE, LLC, ROSE LANE and FRANNY'S OPERATIONS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee: THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, GLENN YOUNGKIN, Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity, JASON S. MIYARES, Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity and others
Palani Karupaiyan v. , et alIn re: Palani Karupaiyan v. , et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-2878
Petitioner: In re: PALANI KARUPAIYAN
Plaintiff: P. P., R. P. and SANTHOSH SUBRAMANIYAN
Respondent: JUDGE SHALIMAR GROUP OF RESTRAURANTS, individually and in her capacity as Judge of Appellate division of NJ, JUDGE L. NAGANANDA, individually and in her capacity as Judge of Appellate division of NJ, JUDGE NAGA LAW FIRM, individually and in her capacity as Judge of Appellate division of NJ and others
Palani Karupaiyan, et al v. Lee Solomon, et al
as 23-1788
Defendant / Appellee: In re: JUSTICE LEE A. SOLOMON, individually and in his official capacity as Chief Justice of Supreme Court of NJ, SHALIMAR GROUP OF RESTRAURANTS, L. NAGANANDA, individually and in his official capacity as owner of Naga Law Firm and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: PALANI KARUPAIYAN, P. P. and R. P.
Plaintiff / Appellee: SANTHOSH SUBRAMANIYAN
Debtor / Appellee: OAK TREE VILLAGE and EDISON TOWNSHIP NEW JERSEY
KARUPAIYAN et al v. SHALIMAR GROUP OF RESTAURANTS et al
as 2:2023cv00886
Plaintiff: PALANI KARUPAIYAN, SANTHOSH SUBRAMANIYAN, P P. and others
Defendant: SHALIMAR GROUP OF RESTAURANTS, L. NAGANANDA, NAGA LAW FIRM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KARUPAIYAN et al v. SHALIMAR GROUP OF RESTAURANTS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00844
Plaintiff: PALANI KARUPAIYAN, SANTHOSH SUBRAMANIYAN, P. P. and others
Defendant: SHALIMAR GROUP OF RESTAURANTS, L. NAGANANDA, NAGA LAW FIRM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Palani Karupaiyan, et al v. L. Naganda, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-2066
Plaintiff / Appellant: PALANI KARUPAIYAN
Plaintiff / Appellee: P. P. and R. P.
Defendant / Appellee: L. NAGANDA, individually and in his official capacity as Owner of Naga Law Firm, NAGA LAW FIRM, J. RAMYA and others
Defendant: JUDGE BARRY T. ALBIN, individually and in her official capacity as Judge of Appellate Division of NJ, JUDGE ATLANTIC REALTY DEVELOPMENT CORP AND MIDDLESEX MANAGEMENT, individually and in her official capacity as Judge of Appellate Division of NJ, JUDGE CRAIG CORSON, individually and in her official capacity as Judge of Appellate Division of NJ and others
CLARK v. COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv02401
Plaintiff: JOVANO CLARK
Defendant: COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX, MIDDLESEX COUNTY ADULT CORRECTIONAL CENTER, MARK J. CRANSTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kojo Muata, et al v. Marcus HIcks, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-3210
Plaintiff / Appellant: KOJO MUATA and CARLOS LOPEZ
Plaintiff / Appellee: RONALD ROBBINS
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF RAHWAY NEW JERSEY, County Of Middlesex, JAMES SLAUGHTER, Administrator of East Jersey State Prison and MARCUS O. HICKS, Esq., Commissioner of the Department of Corrections
Everton Bartley v. State of New Jersey, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-2748
Plaintiff / Appellant: EVERTON BARTLEY
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, COLONEL JUSTIN J. DINTINO, Superintendent of the State Police, COLONEL JOSEPH RICK FUENTES, Superintendent of the State Police and others
Defendant: COLONEL STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Superintendent of the State Police

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?