Cases 21 - 30 of 223
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04453
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Crosby v. Colleton County Sheriff's Office, The et al
as 2:2022cv03897
Plaintiff:
Colby William Crosby
Defendant:
Colleton County Sheriff's Office, The, Sheriff Guerry Buddy Hill and Jacob Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
US v. David Crosby
as 22-4504
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID CROSBY
Crosby v. Kijikazi
as 3:2022cv00563
Plaintiff:
Jacob William Crosby
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijikazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Reynolds v. Summey et al
as 2:2022cv02649
Plaintiff:
Delisa M. Reynolds
Defendant:
Keith R. Summey, Deborah Crosby Summey, North Charleston, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Jamison v. Clarke et al
as 3:2022cv00425
Plaintiff:
Daniel William Jamison
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, David Robinson, Mark Amonette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Jeffrey Crosby
as 22-6652
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JEFFREY ROY CROSBY
Pike v. Caldwell County et al
as 5:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
Nathan Pike
Defendant:
Caldwell County, Roger Crosby, Jennifer Matthews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reaves v. Dickens et al
as 4:2022cv00318
Plaintiff:
Kathy Juanita Reaves
Defendant:
Charles M. Dickens, South Carolina Highway Patrol, South Carolina Department of Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Crosby v. Nines et al
as 1:2021cv03140
Plaintiff:
Antonio Brandon Crosby
Defendant:
Warden Jeff Nines and Lt. Vaughn Whiteman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
