Cases 11 - 20 of 57
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00876
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Stafford v. Kedrion S.p.A et al
as 1:2022cv00573
Plaintiff:
Furquan R. Stafford
Defendant:
Kedrion S.p.A, Kedrion BioPharma, Inc., Octapharma AG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Race Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2021cv04195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
CSL Plasma Inc., et al v. United States Customs and Border Protection, et al
as 21-5282
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CSL Plasma Inc., CSL Behring L.L.C., Biomat USA, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Customs and Border Protection and Chris Magnus, Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
CSL PLASMA INC. et al v. U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION et al
as 1:2021cv02360
Plaintiff:
CSL PLASMA INC., CSL BEHRING L.L.C., BIOMAT USA, INC. and others
Defendant:
U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION and TROY A. MILLER
Interested Party:
Immune Deficiency Foundation
Petitioner:
GBS/CIDP FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL INC.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Young v. CSL Plasma, INC.
as 3:2021cv01208
Defendant:
CSL Plasma, INC.
Plaintiff:
Maurice Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carrero et al v. CSL Plasma Inc.
as 1:2021cv00228
Plaintiff:
Joseph Carrero and Thomas Whitney
Defendant:
CSL Plasma Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stafford v. Kedrion S.p.A. et al
as 1:2020cv04970
Defendant:
OctaPharma AG, Grifols, S.A., CSL Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Furquan R. Stafford
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
