Cases 1 - 10 of 18
THOMAS v. PFLEGAR
as 1:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
CAMERON THOMAS
Defendant:
PFLEGAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zelesnik v. Massie et al
as 2:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
Paula Zelesnik
Defendant:
Massie, The Christ Hospital KOI, Cameron Thomas and others
Thomas v. Old # 5 Road Bar & Grill, LLC et al
as 8:2023cv00841
Plaintiff:
Cameron Thomas
Defendant:
Old # 5 Road Bar & Grill, LLC and Daniel LaClair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 3:2023cv01359
Plaintiff:
Cameron Thomas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
MANUEL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10178
Plaintiff:
CAMERON THOMAS MANUEL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jay Thomas v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15194
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAY CAMERON THOMAS
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Simpson et al v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv08222
Plaintiff:
Bryce Simpson, Ashton Smith, Michaela Smith and others
Defendant:
Juul Labs Inc., James Monsees, Adam Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Simpson et al v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06740
Plaintiff:
Bryce Simpson, Ashton Smith, Michaela Smith and others
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., James Monsees, Adam Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MERACLE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12864
Plaintiff:
KEITH CAMERON THOMAS MERACLE and KEITH CAMERON MERACLE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
THOMAS v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2022cv01226
Plaintiff:
CAMERON THOMAS
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DAUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
