Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Andrew Lancaster v. Tammy L. Campbell
as 2:2023cv05122
Petitioner:
Andrew Lancaster
Respondent:
Tammy L. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CAMPBELL v. FLUKE et al
as 5:2018cv05077
Respondent:
Darin Young, Dennis Daugaard, Brent Fluke and others
Petitioner:
KELLY JOE CAMPBELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In re: Angelo Fears, et al v. John Kasich, et al
as 16-3149
:
In re: OHIO EXECUTION PROTOCOL LITIGATION
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANGELO FEARS, RICHARD BAYS, ALVA E. CAMPBELL, JR. and others
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN KASICH, Governor, State of Ohio, GARY C. MOHR, Director, ODRC, DONALD MORGAN, Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility and others
Campbell v. Jenkins
as 2:2015cv01702
Petitioner:
Alva E Campbell, Jr
Respondent:
Charlotte Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson et al v. Perry et al
as 5:2015ct03008
Plaintiff:
Marcus Reymond Robinson , James Edward Thomas , Archie Lee Billings and others
Defendant:
Frank L. Perry and Carlton Joyner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Robert Campbell v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 14-70020
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT JAMES CAMPBELL
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, JAMES JONES, Senior Warden, Huntsville Unit Huntsville, Texas and others
Joseph Smith v. Donal Campbell, et al
as 14-10721
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSEPH CLIFTON SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
DONAL CAMPBELL and KIM TOBIAS THOMAS, Commissioner
In Re: Ohio Execution Protocol Litigation
as 2:2011cv01016
Plaintiff:
Bennie Adams , Stanley Adams , Tyrone Ballew and others
Defendant:
John Kasich , Gary C Mohr , Donald Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alva Campbell, Jr. v. Margaret Bradshaw
as 09-3444
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALVA E. CAMPBELL, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
MARGARET BRADSHAW, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
