Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Evanston Insurance Company v. Tracee Portee Murphy, et al
as 21-16116
Plaintiff:
EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
CHERELLE MURPHY, ARTHUR MURPHY, LATOYA MURPHY and others
Counter Claimant:
TRACEE PORTEE MURPHY
Canty v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv06197
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Donna Canty
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Scott Canty et al v. Providence Health System-Southern California et al
as 2:2020cv03347
Defendant:
Providence Little Company of Mary Medical Center, American Red Cross, DOES 1 through 75 inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
CHERYL CANTY and SCOTT CANTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Evanston Insurance Company v. Murphy et al
as 2:2019cv04954
Defendant:
Latoya Murphy, Ricky Taylor, Sedale Portee and others
Plaintiff:
Evanston Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Butler v. Canty-Basham
as 2:2019cv00965
Defendant:
Canty-Basham
Plaintiff:
Amelia Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Canty v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2018cv05810
Plaintiff:
Donna Canty
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Kyle Canty v. King County, et al
as 18-35659
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KYLE LYDELL CANTY
Defendant - Appellee:
KING COUNTY, CITY OF SEATTLE, TIMOTHY RENIHAN, Police Officer, sued individually and in his official capacity and others
Daniel Dydzak v. USA, et al
as 18-15673
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, MATTHEW C. ROGERS, AKA Matt Rogers and others
Daniel Dydzak v. USA, et al
as 17-17401
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, MATTHEW C. ROGERS, AKA Matt Rogers and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
