Cases 71 - 80 of 1,054
BLOCKER v. KELLY et al
as 1:2023cv21114
Plaintiff:
KAREEM ABDUL BLOCKER
Defendant:
WARDEN KELLY, CAPTAIN TROUT and SGT. GILBERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUNTER v. SUTTER et al
as 1:2023cv00287
Plaintiff:
RON ALLEN HUNTER, JR.
Defendant:
SEYMOUR SUTTER, LT. VOLZ, WARDEN SUTTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04741
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Thomas Waters v. BOP, et al
as 23-2918
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS WATERS
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY POLLUCK, UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY FLORENCE and others
BESSKO v. CENTER TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2023cv01778
Plaintiff:
CSABA BESSKO
Defendant:
CENTER TOWNSHIP, WILLIAM CALVIN PEAKE, DARIN K. HEPLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BLOCKER v. KELLY et al
as 1:2023cv21391
Plaintiff:
KAREEM ABDUL BLOCKER
Defendant:
WARDEN KELLY, SUPERIOR CRIMINAL COURTS, DEPUTY WARDEN CARBARER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosero v. Penhorwood et al
as 1:2023cv01898
Plaintiff:
Dr. John C. Rosero
Defendant:
Trooper Jacob Penhorwood, Trooper Shane R. Dressler, Colonel Robert Evanchik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. HENRY et al
as 2:2023cv01686
Plaintiff:
AKIL ASIM JOHNSON
Defendant:
MICHELLE HENRY, MICHAEL ZAKEN, STEPHEN BUZAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WALSH v. UPMC ALTOONA et al
as 3:2023cv00241
Plaintiff:
JAMES WALSH
Defendant:
UPMC ALTOONA, CAPTAIN CLARK, SUSAN WENZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILLIAMS v. ENGLISH et al
as 3:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
JOHN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
ENGLISH, CAPTAIN MOONEY, SINCLAIR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
