Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Britt v. Durham et al
as 1:2024cv00118
Defendant:
Chandler Durham, Turbo the Great, Warner-Chappell Music, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jamal Britt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
CELESTIN v. MARAJ-PETTY et al
as 1:2023cv03335
Defendant:
ONIKA MARAJ-PETTY, AUBREY GRAHAM, DAVID BREWSTER and others
Plaintiff:
ROSE Y. CELESTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dirahn Gilliams v. Universal Music Group, et al
as 23-2466
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DIRAHN DENNIS GILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP
Defendant:
CASH MONEY RECORDS, JAMES SCHEFFER and DWAYNE CATER
GILLIAMS v. UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP et al
as 2:2022cv03889
Plaintiff:
DIRAHN DENNIS GILLIAMS
Defendant:
UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP, CASH MONEY RECORDS, JAMES SCHEFFER and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Jackson v. Apple et al
as 5:2022cv00928
Plaintiff:
Heaven Jackson
Defendant:
Apple, Verizon, Steak & Shake and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Frazier v. Cash Money Records
as 2:2021cv00421
Plaintiff:
Melvin Frazier, Jr.
Defendant:
Cash Money Records
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bey v. Cash Money Records
as 1:2021cv21732
Defendant:
Cash Money Records
Plaintiff:
Elidion Aristide Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Headley v. Universal Music Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv11120
Defendant:
Onika Tanya Maraj-Petty, Tokyo Ninja, LLC, Universal Music Group, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Jawara Headley, Jawara Headley and Brinx Billions
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
(PC) Barnes v. T.V. Network et al
as 2:2020cv01859
Defendant:
T.V. Network, All Rap Music Icons, Videos, D. Trump and others
Plaintiff:
Antoine Deshawn Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Barnes v. T.V. Network et al
as 1:2020cv01331
Defendant:
T.V. Network, All Rap Music Icons, Videos, D. Trump and others
Plaintiff:
Antoine Deshawn Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
