Cases 11 - 20 of 630
(PC) Baker v. Cervantes
as 2:2023cv02610
Plaintiff:
James Ray Baker
Defendant:
Cervantes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruiz v. Nieto et al
as 2:2023cv02309
Plaintiff:
Martin Moreno Ruiz
Defendant:
Enrique Pena Nieto, Salvador Cienfuegos Zepeda, Jesus Gabriel Lopez Benitez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Juan Cervantes v. USA
as 23-2857
Petitioner / Appellant:
JUAN J. CERVANTES
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Viviana Cervantes v. Warden
as 5:2023cv01516
Petitioner:
Viviana Cervantes
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hector Cervantes-Torres v. USA
as 23-55617
Petitioner / Appellant:
HECTOR MANUEL CERVANTES-TORRES, AKA Hector Manuel Cervantes, AKA Manuel Hector Cervantes, AKA Hector Cervantes-Torres
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cervantes v. Willis et al
as 3:2023cv02176
Plaintiff:
Marcos Cervantes
Defendant:
Anthony D Willis, Daniel C Porter, Alex A Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CERVANTES v. UNDERWOOD
as 3:2023cv00163
Petitioner:
ENRIQUE ANTONIO CERVANTES
Respondent:
WARDEN MICHAEL UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Thomas v. USA
as 3:2023cv00496
Petitioner:
Cervante Lashun Thomas
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Cervantes v. Warden Joseph, FCI Bennettsville
as 9:2023cv02472
Petitioner:
Rafael Cervantes
Respondent:
Warden Joseph, FCI Bennettsville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Thomas v. Texas Dept of Criminal Justice et al
as 2:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
Ronald Thomas
Defendant:
Texas Dept of Criminal Justice, Bobby Lumpkin, Warden Flannel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
