Cases 11 - 20 of 2,214
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01311
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Cervantes v. Unknown Parties et al
as 2:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
Linda Cervantes
Defendant:
Unknown Parties named as: John Doe Corporations I-X - an Arizona entity doing business as El Guapo Envios, Jose L Mejia Torres, Unknown Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cervantes v. General Motors, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv10336
Plaintiff:
Maria E. Cervantes
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC, Does 1 through 10 inclusive and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Erika Cervantes v. Target Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00891
Plaintiff:
Erika Cervantes
Defendant:
Target Corporation, DOES 1 through 0 and ROE Corporations
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Fierros et al v. Gupta et al
as 3:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
Maria Elena Fierros, Miguel Cervantes Barboza and Jose Antonio Cervantes Barboza
Defendant:
Anshu Kumar Gupta, MD, Scripps Memorial Hospital Encinitas, Does 1 to 40 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 pi Removal- Personal Injury
Cervantes v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00293
Petitioner:
Tony Cervantes
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Annika Detti v. Path Bridge Home et al
as 2:2024cv00732
Plaintiff:
Annika Detti
Defendant:
Path Bridge Home, Neri Riveas, Fernando Cervantes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
